Who is timothy hutton dating
Long-age proponents will dismiss this sort of evidence for a young age of the earth by arguing that the assumptions about the past do not apply in these cases.
In other words, age is not really a matter of scientific observation but an argument about our assumptions about the unobserved past.
Many of these indicators for younger ages were discovered when creationist scientists started researching things that were supposed to ‘prove’ long ages.
The lesson here is clear: when the evolutionists throw up some new challenge to the Bible’s timeline, don’t fret over it.
However, to draw this conclusion we have to assume that the rate of cratering has been the same in the past as it is now.
A state constitutional amendment passed in April 2015 eliminated the seniority selection of the chief justice, opting for a vote by current justices.
Sooner or later that supposed evidence will be turned on its head and will even be added to this list of evidences for a younger age of the earth.
On the other hand, some of the evidences listed here might turn out to be ill-founded with further research and will need to be modified.
The Bible claims to be the communication of the only One who witnessed the events of Creation: the Creator himself.
As such, the Bible is the only reliable means of knowing the age of the earth and the cosmos.
Such is the nature of science, especially historical science, because we cannot do experiments on past events (see “It’s not science”).